Only 48 hours before the NYC mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange issued a bold electoral prediction – not just the winner citywide, but block by block. Lange, a political analyst born and raised in New York City, has spent more than ten years in progressive politics and has become a kind of well-known figure recently for his thorough analyses into city data and voter surveys.
He published his highly detailed prediction map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani would win while missing the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his newsletter, his platform. Lange has a flair for witty coinages. He highlighted, as an example, the divide between the “commie corridor”, stretching from one neighborhood to Bushwick to Astoria, where he forecasted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal outrank the mainstream paper” in readership and most voters leaned toward Cuomo, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.
What was your election night?
It was necessary since they were adding around 200,000 votes into the tally frequently! I felt a little nervous initially: The candidate was ahead the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but came two big batches of ballots added after that and the advantage went from 12% to 8%. I was worried.
You know, there was a world in which yesterday turned out kind of poorly for Mamdani, in which Cuomo would have basically increasing his support from the Democratic primary. But Mamdani added half a million supporters to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He campaigned and greatly broadened his support from the primary.
Where did Mamdani gain additional support from?
He built the coalition that the left always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, youthful, tenants and it’s people facing cost pressures. He gained significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the primary. Additionally he further maximized his base of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without expanding his appeal.
He created the alliance that progressives long aimed for: multiracial, young, renters and residents struggling with costs
There were also a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?
It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, confined to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Muslims. Voters in immigrant strongholds that supported the former president previously backed Zohran this year. But it’s not that he was gaining white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.
A major development of the night was the record turnout. Who benefited?
Each candidate. Turnout was significantly higher than anticipated. I figured we might go over 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – that is a huge number of participants. Existed a decent opposition group, energized, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that sufficed to secure victory.
You forecasted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he likely for that?
Currently you would say he’s favored to get over 50%. He’s at just over 50% but remain probably 200,000 votes left to report at that time. Thus it’s not certain, but I think it’s likely, and I wish he does because afterwards none can claim Sliwa was a spoiler.
Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His support completely collapsed.
He lost a single precinct in any area. Including Tottenville in the borough, which is like an 88% Trump neighborhood. That really was unexpected. The independent held Caucasian districts, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained many Republicans on Staten Island who had a high participation. I believe occurred significant tactical voting by GOP voters. They were doing it before the former president tweeted his support for the candidate, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome unless the winning alliance failed to expand.
What about your much mentioned left-wing base – was support for Mamdani overwhelming in those areas of the boroughs?
I think there was a little dilution of the commie corridor in some areas like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, for example, the Greek landlords and homeowners all went for Cuomo. Thus there existed some opposition. However overall, largely the commie corridor is a key factor why Mamdani prevailed – he was polling between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.
In the lead-up to the vote there was coverage on whether the candidate was gaining ground with the community. Is there any suggestion that he did?
Exist neighborhoods with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. But in the affluent districts such as the Upper East Side, his position on Israel was influential there. Likewise in the moderate communities including Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored Cuomo. Plus, you have Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in the borough, who were pretty staunchly supportive. Therefore I don’t know if existed crazy narrative-busters on this one, but he retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the another locale by big margins.
Has Mamdani rewritten what the city means politically? Will the commie corridor become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?
Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest political leaders from the left come from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I believe that there will be more of that – people will come from these areas to be promoted to higher office.
However I think that each urban center in the US can have their own commie corridor. Urban places are the epicenters of leftwing power in the nation – because they’re young, people rent and they are places where individuals struggle by the inequalities exist.
A tech strategist and writer passionate about digital transformation and emerging technologies.